Re: usbfs, claiming entire usb devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:15:34PM -0700, Hal Murray wrote:
> > Yes, I 've bumped into that once already. It is not a very big deal if
> > you don't reboot very often, but I guess I should see if there is any
> > way to have somewhat persistent naming for ports based on their
> > physical location. I doubt this is implementable with current
> > technology though. (At least in a straightforward way)
> 
> Would somebody please say a bit more about this area.  What "number" space 
> are we discussing?
> 
> Do ports get renumbered on booting because of timing issues (race 
> conditions)?  I guess I would expect that if a system had 2 USB host 
> controllers./hubs on a PCI bus with one type X gizmo on each USB bus.
> 
> Another possibility is that things get assigned numbers in the order they are 
> plugged in and then get a new set of numbers based on probe order when the 
> system is rebooted.

Both of these can happen.

Also PCI buses can enumerate in different ways, as a laptop that I have
here likes to do every 3rd boot or so.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux