Hi,
On 1/11/2019 1:13 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> If a function driver tries to re-submit an already queued request,
>> it can results in corruption of pending/started request lists.
>> Catch such conditions and fail the request submission to DCD.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> index 679c12e14522..51716c6b286a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> @@ -1290,6 +1290,12 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req)
>> &req->request, req->dep->name))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + if (req->request.status == -EINPROGRESS) {
> this test is really not enough. What if gadget driver set status to
> EINPROGRESS before submission? A better check would involve making sure
> req isn't part of dep->pending_list or dep->started_list or
> dep->cancelled_list. It's clear that this won't work very well as the
> amount of requests grow.
Thanks for quick review.
'request.status' check can be replaced:
+if (!list_empty(&req->list) {
And replace list_del with list_del_init from dwc3_gadget_giveback()
>
> Anyway, which gadget driver did this? Why is it only affecting dwc3?
Function driver is not in upstream (f_mtp.c).
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
