> Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes: > >> +static void cdns3_gadget_config(struct cdns3_device *priv_dev) { > >> + struct cdns3_usb_regs __iomem *regs = priv_dev->regs; > >> + > >> + cdns3_ep0_config(priv_dev); > >> + > >> + /* enable interrupts for endpoint 0 (in and out) */ > >> + writel(EP_IEN_EP_OUT0 | EP_IEN_EP_IN0, ®s->ep_ien); > >> + > >> + /* enable generic interrupt*/ > >> + writel(USB_IEN_INIT, ®s->usb_ien); > >> + writel(USB_CONF_CLK2OFFDS | USB_CONF_L1DS, ®s->usb_conf); > >> + writel(USB_CONF_DMULT, ®s->usb_conf); > >> + writel(USB_CONF_DEVEN, ®s->usb_conf); > > > > If you are enabling interrupts in this patch you should handle them in the ISR. > > Frankly, I don't understand why this is a series. It's a single driver and splitting it into > a series just makes it more difficult to review, actually. > > Sure, a single patch will be large, but there's no way to have a functional driver until > all patches are applied, anyway. > Yes, I agree with Felipe. Pawel, you could remove the "RFC" prefix, and send the whole one as one patch. I will test it at my hardware. Peter