Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: dwc3: Add reference clock properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Felipe,

On 11/7/2018 11:17 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thinh Nguyen <thinh.nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
>>>>>> index 636630fb92d7..712b344c3a31 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
>>>>>> @@ -95,6 +95,24 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>>>  			this and tx-thr-num-pkt-prd to a valid, non-zero value
>>>>>>  			1-16 (DWC_usb31 programming guide section 1.2.3) to
>>>>>>  			enable periodic ESS TX threshold.
>>>>>> + - snps,refclk-period-ns: set to program the reference clock period. The valid
>>>>>> +   			input periods are as follow:
>>>>>> +			+-------------+-----------------+
>>>>>> +			| Period (ns) | Freq (MHz)      |
>>>>>> +			+-------------+-----------------+
>>>>>> +			| 25          | 39.7/40         |
>>>>>> +			| 41          | 24.4            |
>>>>>> +			| 50          | 20              |
>>>>>> +			| 52          | 19.2            |
>>>>>> +			| 58          | 17.2            |
>>>>>> +			| 62          | 16.1            |
>>>>>> +			+-------------+-----------------+
>>>>>> + - snps,enable-refclk-lpm: set to enable low power scheduling of isochronous
>>>>>> +			transfers by running SOF/ITP counters using the
>>>>>> +			reference clock. Only valid for DWC_usb31 peripheral
>>>>>> +			controller v1.80a and higher. Both
>>>>>> +			"snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk" and
>>>>>> +			"snps,dis_enblslpm_quirk" must not be set.
>>>>> sounds like you should rely on clk API here. Then on driver call
>>>>> clk_get_rate() to computer whatever you need to compute.
>>>>>
>>>> There's nothing to compute here. We can simply enable this feature with
>>>> "snps, enable-refclk-lpm" and the controller will use the default refclk
>>>> settings.
>>> Right, right. What I'm saying, though, is that we have a clock API for
>>> describing a clock. So why wouldn't we rely on that API for this? I
>>> think both of these new properties can be replaced with standard clock
>>> API properties:
>>>
>>> 	clocks = <&clk1>, ..., <&lpm_clk>
>>>         clock-names = "clock1", ...., "lpm";
>>>
>>> Then dwc3 core could, simply, check if we have a clock named "lpm" and
>>> if there is, use NSECS_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate() to get its period and
>>> write it to the register that needs the information.
>> There's no new clock here. We are using the ref_clk for SOF and ITP
>> counter for this feature. Also, clocks are optional on non-DT platforms.
>> To use the clock API, then we need to update the driver to allow some
>> optional clock such as "ref" clock for non-DT platforms. Do you want to
>> do it like this?
> I can't think of a problem that would arise from that. Can you? Mark,
> Rob, what do you think?
>
No problem. That can be done. This will remove the
"snps,refclk-period-ns" property. But we should have
"snps,enable-refclk-lpm" to enable this feature.

Thinh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux