On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 20:10, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:51:44AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: >> On Wednesday 29 April 2009, Alan Stern wrote: >> > I don't see any point in putting endpoints on the usb bus. They might >> > as well remain "busless", if at all possible. >> >> So long as they stay in the right part of the driver tree ... >> > So we would have >> > /sys/bus/usb/devices/4-0:1.0/4-0:1.0_ep81/ >> > or even just >> > /sys/bus/usb/devices/4-0:1.0/ep81/ >> > but not >> > /sys/bus/usb/devices/4-0:1.0_ep81/ >> >> And in all cases, I'd still prefer "ep1-in" or "ep12-out" >> to "ep81" and "ep0c". > > Nah, that's not the "address" :) Oh, there is the symlink already with the the "address", so we are free to name the device, right? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
