On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:11:32AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > What about moving the endpoints to the "usb" bus instead of its own > > weird class? I don't really know why there is an enpoint class at all, > > and what makes them different from usb-devices or usb-interfaces? The > > endpoints are part of the core just like the interfaces are, right? > > > > Can't we just have them as: > > /devices/pci.../usb4/4-0:1.0/4-0:1.0_ep81 > > instead of: > > /devices/pci.../usb4/4-0:1.0/usb_endpoint/usbdev4.1_ep81 > > > > The usbdevX.Y* name is not used anywhere else. > > Yeah, I'll go change that as well. I have a 4 hour phone meeting today, > so I should have plenty of time for things like this :) Hm, in looking at these, we want that information in sysfs (endpoint descriptor info), and want the device nodes someday. So I'll just leave them for now. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
