2009/4/28 Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 00:17, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:38:09PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: >>> On Monday 27 April 2009, Greg KH wrote: >>> > Here's 3 patches that removes the usb_host class, and the two current >>> > users of it, as it isn't really needed. >>> > >>> > Any objections to these patches? >>> >>> You seem to be doing some spring cleaning on the USB stack ... ;) >> >> Heh, yeah, it needs it in places :) > > We could need spring several times in a year. :) > > What about moving the endpoints to the "usb" bus instead of its own > weird class? I don't really know why there is an enpoint class at all, Yes, I agree. Maybe endpoint class was introduced to help implementing usbfs2, which is obsolete now, seems. > and what makes them different from usb-devices or usb-interfaces? The > endpoints are part of the core just like the interfaces are, right? Yes, endpoint 0 is part of usb device, and other endpoints should belong to interface. > > Can't we just have them as: > /devices/pci.../usb4/4-0:1.0/4-0:1.0_ep81 > instead of: > /devices/pci.../usb4/4-0:1.0/usb_endpoint/usbdev4.1_ep81 > > The usbdevX.Y* name is not used anywhere else. -- Lei Ming -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
