Hi Alan, Ulf,
at 14:17, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although rtsx_usb doesn't support card removal detection, card insertion
will resume rtsx_usb by USB remote wakeup signaling.
When rtsx_usb gets resumed, also resumes its child devices,
rtsx_usb_sdmmc and rtsx_usb_ms, to notify them there's a card in its
slot.
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_usb.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_usb.c
b/drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_usb.c
index b97903ff1a72..f7a66f614085 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_usb.c
@@ -723,8 +723,15 @@ static int rtsx_usb_suspend(struct usb_interface
*intf, pm_message_t message)
return 0;
}
+static int rtsx_usb_resume_child(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+ pm_request_resume(dev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int rtsx_usb_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
{
+ device_for_each_child(&intf->dev, NULL, rtsx_usb_resume_child);
return 0;
}
@@ -734,6 +741,7 @@ static int rtsx_usb_reset_resume(struct usb_interface
*intf)
(struct rtsx_ucr *)usb_get_intfdata(intf);
rtsx_usb_reset_chip(ucr);
+ device_for_each_child(&intf->dev, NULL, rtsx_usb_resume_child);
return 0;
}
I am working on the next version of this series, and the last missing
puzzle is to differentiate system-wide resume from runtime resume in
usb_driver's resume() and reset_resume() callback.
The parent device, rtsx_usb, has two child devices, rtsx_usb_ms and
rtsx_usb_sdmmc.
pm_request_resume() is used in rtsx_usb's resume() to facilitate USB remote
wakeup signaling, so we don't need to poll the card slot status.
But this has a side effect: during system resume the rtsx_usb calls
pm_request_resume() in its resume(), so child devices calls their
runtime_resume() instead of resume() callback.
So, is it reasonable to pass pm_message_t to resume() and reset_resume()
callbacks and use PMSG_IS_AUTO() to differentiate them?
Kai-Heng
--
2.17.1