Re: [PATCH 03/23] xhci: Ring allocation and initialization.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag 28 April 2009 04:52:34 schrieb Sarah Sharp:
> > +/**
> > + * struct doorbell_array
> > + *
> > + * Section 5.6
> > + */
> > +struct xhci_doorbell_array {
> > +       u32     doorbell[256];
> > +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
> If you declare this packed, does gcc still give you atomic writes on
> all platforms or will it write bytewise?

For that matter ... why "packed"?  To ensure that it can
be un-aligned?  I thought it was pretty much guaranteed
that an array of same-size values will have no padding.  :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux