Re: usb HC busted?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Greg KH wrote:

> > From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:50:00 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] hacky solution to mem-corruption
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/core/message.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > index 7cd4ec33dbf4..7fdf7a27611d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > @@ -1398,7 +1398,8 @@ int usb_set_interface(struct usb_device *dev, int interface, int alternate)
> >  		remove_intf_ep_devs(iface);
> >  		usb_remove_sysfs_intf_files(iface);
> >  	}
> > -	usb_disable_interface(dev, iface, true);
> > +	if (!(iface->cur_altsetting && alt))
> > +		usb_disable_interface(dev, iface, true);
> 
> 
> 
> This feels like a "correct" patch anyway, why would a driver keep
> calling set_interface to an interface that it was already set to?
> 
> But can't we check for this higher up in the function?  This hack will
> just not disable an interface but it will do all of the other stuff
> being asked for.  Does the patch below also solve this for you?  It's
> not a good solution of course, but it might work around the problem a
> bit better.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> index 1a15392326fc..0f718f1a1ca3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> @@ -1376,6 +1376,14 @@ int usb_set_interface(struct usb_device *dev, int interface, int alternate)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (iface->cur_altsetting == alt) {
> +		/*
> +		 * foolish bluetooth stack, don't try to set a setting you are
> +		 * already set to...
> +		 */
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Make sure we have enough bandwidth for this alternate interface.
>  	 * Remove the current alt setting and add the new alt setting.
>  	 */

No, neither of these is right.  It's possible to use 
usb_set_interface() as a kind of "soft" reset.  Even when the new 
altsetting is specified to be the same as the current one, we still 
have to tell the lower-layer drivers and hardware about it.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux