On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:11:33PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Greg, any objections to rip out the usb_host class? > > > > I see the "companion" attribute still present, but if Alan says it's not > > needed, hey, no objection from me :) > > No, that's not what I said. It is still needed, but it doesn't have to > go in the class directory. It can go in the device directory for the > host controller instead; then there won't be anything remaining in the > usb_host class. Hm, I just noticed that the wireless usb controllers put a number of files in the usb_host directory that they reside in. Kay, care to poke into this to see if it's really needed or not? > P.S.: We have wandered off the original $SUBJECT. Greg, what do you > think we should do about /proc/bus/usb/devices? > > 1. Remove it entirely. > > 2. Move it somewhere else inside /proc. > > 3. Make it an artificial device node under /dev/bus/usb. > > 4. Move it to debugfs. I like this option. So much so I just went and implemented it, I'll post the patch series to do this to linux-usb in a bit :) If we keep the file around in debugfs, do you have any objection to the original patch here? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
