Although nobody seems to have made a big deal about it, the conversions between utf8 and utf16 done by fs/nls/nls_base.c are wrong in a couple of important respects: They don't handle Unicode code points larger than U+FFFF. They don't detect invalid values, in particular, surrogate code points. The problems stem from the fact the characters at issue can't be represented by a single 16-bit wchar_t. But that's no excuse for performing an incorrect conversion to or from utf16. Are there any definite thoughts on how this should be handled? I don't see any way for the single-character conversion routines (utf8_mbtowc and utf8_wctomb) to come to grips with these issues, except perhaps for returning an error when a character would be invalid or too big to fit in 16 bits. The string-oriented routines (utf8_mbstowcs and utf8_wcstombs) could be adapted to deal with these issues properly. Any comments or suggestions for other approaches? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html