Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Thomson [mailto:Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2018年6月25日 18:46 > To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx; cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx; shufan_lee@xxxxxxxxxxx; > Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 06/14] usb: typec: tcpm: support get typec and pd config > from device properties > > On 25 June 2018 09:09, Li Jun wrote: > > > This patch adds support of get typec and power delivery config from > > firmware description. > > > > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c | 132 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > --- > > 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c index > > d22b37b..0454654 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c > > @@ -4236,6 +4236,81 @@ static int tcpm_copy_vdos(u32 *dest_vdo, const > > u32 *src_vdo, > > return nr_vdo; > > } > > ... > > > struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct > > tcpc_dev *tcpc) { > > struct tcpm_port *port; > > int i, err; > > > > - if (!dev || !tcpc || !tcpc->config || > > + if (!dev || !tcpc || > > !tcpc->get_vbus || !tcpc->set_cc || !tcpc->get_cc || > > !tcpc->set_polarity || !tcpc->set_vconn || !tcpc->set_vbus || > > !tcpc->set_pd_rx || !tcpc->set_roles || !tcpc->pd_transmit) @@ > > -4556,30 +4655,19 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct > > device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) > > init_completion(&port->pps_complete); > > tcpm_debugfs_init(port); > > > > - if (tcpm_validate_caps(port, tcpc->config->src_pdo, > > - tcpc->config->nr_src_pdo) || > > - tcpm_validate_caps(port, tcpc->config->snk_pdo, > > - tcpc->config->nr_snk_pdo)) { > > - err = -EINVAL; > > + if (tcpc->config) > > + err = tcpm_copy_caps(port, tcpc->config); > > + else > > + err = tcpm_fw_get_caps(port, tcpc->fwnode); > > + if (err < 0) > > Should we not be favouring the generic FW based capabilities over values > defined in a Type C port controller driver, if the FW config is present? For > example > fusb302 driver has a hard coded config so that would always be selected rather > than the FW based config, unless I'm missing something obvious? You are right, I will change it to be below: err = tcpm_fw_get_caps(port, tcpc->fwnode); if ((err < 0) && tcpc->config) err = tcpm_copy_caps(port, tcpc->config); thanks Jun ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳???骅w* jg????????G??⒏ ⒎?:+v???????? ????＂??????
