Re: [PATCH 1/2] Convert target drivers to use sbitmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> index 025dc2d3f3de..cdf671c2af61 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> @@ -3719,7 +3719,8 @@ void qlt_free_cmd(struct qla_tgt_cmd *cmd)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  	cmd->jiffies_at_free = get_jiffies_64();
> -	percpu_ida_free(&sess->se_sess->sess_tag_pool, cmd->se_cmd.map_tag);
> +	sbitmap_queue_clear(&sess->se_sess->sess_tag_pool, cmd->se_cmd.map_tag,
> +			cmd->se_cmd.map_cpu);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(qlt_free_cmd);

Please introduce functions in the target core for allocating and freeing a tag
instead of spreading the knowledge of how to allocate and free tags over all
target drivers.
 
> +int iscsit_wait_for_tag(struct se_session *se_sess, int state, int *cpup)
> +{
> +	int tag = -1;
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +	struct sbq_wait_state *ws;
> +
> +	if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
> +		return tag;
> +
> +	ws = &se_sess->sess_tag_pool.ws[0];
> +	for (;;) {
> +		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ws->wait, &wait, state);
> +		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
> +			break;

This looks weird to me. Shouldn't target code ignore signals instead of causing
tag allocation to fail if a signal is received?

> +		schedule();
> +		tag = sbitmap_queue_get(&se_sess->sess_tag_pool, cpup);
> +	}
> +
> +	finish_wait(&ws->wait, &wait);
> +	return tag;
> +}

Thanks,

Bart.



��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux