Hi, On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:07 PM, William Wu <william.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If isoc split in transfer with no data (the length of DATA0 > packet is zero), we can't simply return immediately. Because > the DATA0 can be the first transaction or the second transaction > for the isoc split in transaction. If the DATA0 packet with no > data is in the first transaction, we can return immediately. > But if the DATA0 packet with no data is in the second transaction > of isoc split in transaction sequence, we need to increase the > qtd->isoc_frame_index and giveback urb to device driver if needed, > otherwise, the MDATA packet will be lost. > > A typical test case is that connect the dwc2 controller with an > usb hs Hub (GL852G-12), and plug an usb fs audio device (Plantronics > headset) into the downstream port of Hub. Then use the usb mic > to record, we can find noise when playback. > > In the case, the isoc split in transaction sequence like this: > > - SSPLIT IN transaction > - CSPLIT IN transaction > - MDATA packet (176 bytes) > - CSPLIT IN transaction > - DATA0 packet (0 byte) > > This patch use both the length of DATA0 and qtd->isoc_split_offset > to check if the DATA0 is in the second transaction. > > Signed-off-by: William Wu <william.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v3: > - Remove "qtd->isoc_split_offset = 0" in the if test > > Changes in v2: > - Modify the commit message > > drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c > index ba6fd852..3003594 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c > @@ -930,9 +930,8 @@ static int dwc2_xfercomp_isoc_split_in(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, > frame_desc = &qtd->urb->iso_descs[qtd->isoc_frame_index]; > len = dwc2_get_actual_xfer_length(hsotg, chan, chnum, qtd, > DWC2_HC_XFER_COMPLETE, NULL); > - if (!len) { > + if (!len && !qtd->isoc_split_offset) { > qtd->complete_split = 0; > - qtd->isoc_split_offset = 0; > return 0; > } This looks fine to me now, but as per my comments on the previous version I don't think I've dug through this problem enough to add my Reviewed-by tag. I'll assume that John or someone with more knowledge of the USB protocol than I have will Review / Ack. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html