Hi Greg,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:39:51PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> This clarifies the license of the code. While here also add an include
>> guard to the header file.
>>
>> Fixes: 07dbff0ddbd86c ("usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD")
>> Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/core/phy.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
>> index bbc969383074..88a3c037e9df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
>> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
>
> Do you _really_ mean GPLv2 or anything later?
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c uses the same license identifier
that code is much more "valuable" than my few lines which manage a
list of PHYs - so I'm fine with "GPLv2 or anything later"
> I have to ask...
if you see any problems with this (for example that phy.h couldn't be
used from some special module with another license, ...) then please
let me know
Regards
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
