On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote:
>
>> On chromebooks we depend on wakeup count to identify the wakeup source.
>> But currently USB devices do not increment the wakeup count when they
>> trigger the remote wake. This patch addresses the same.
>>
>> Resume condition is reported differently on USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 devices.
>>
>> On USB 2.0 devices, a wake capable device, if wake enabled, drives
>> resume signal to indicate a remote wake (USB 2.0 spec section 7.1.7.7).
>> The upstream facing port then sets C_PORT_SUSPEND bit and reports a
>> port change event (USB 2.0 spec section 11.24.2.7.2.3). Thus if a port
>> has resumed before driving the resume signal from the host and
>> C_PORT_SUSPEND is set, then the device attached to the given port might
>> be the reason for the last system wakeup. Increment the wakeup count for
>> the same.
>>
>> On USB 3.0 devices, a function may signal that it wants to exit from device
>> suspend by sending a Function Wake Device Notification to the host (USB3.0
>> spec section 8.5.6.4) Thus on receiving the Function Wake, increment the
>> wakeup count.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> At this point you're supposed to list the differences between this
> patch and the preceding versions.
Mentioned the changes between different versions in V5. Thanks.
>
>> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> index 777036ae63674..b8024ae4fdcaa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> @@ -2375,6 +2375,8 @@ void usb_hcd_resume_root_hub (struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> + if (hcd->rh_registered)
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&hcd->self.root_hub->dev, 0);
>> spin_lock_irqsave (&hcd_root_hub_lock, flags);
>> if (hcd->rh_registered) {
>> set_bit(HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_PENDING, &hcd->flags);
>
> This isn't good enough. hcd->rh_registered can change at any time;
> it is protected by the hcd_root_hub_lock spinlock. That's why I said
> your code should be moved inside the existing "if" statement.
Sorry about this. Fixed it now. Hope this is fine. Thanks.
>
> Alan Stern
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> index f6ea16e9f6bb9..aa9968d90a48c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> @@ -653,12 +653,17 @@ void usb_wakeup_notification(struct usb_device *hdev,
>> unsigned int portnum)
>> {
>> struct usb_hub *hub;
>> + struct usb_port *port_dev;
>>
>> if (!hdev)
>> return;
>>
>> hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(hdev);
>> if (hub) {
>> + port_dev = hub->ports[portnum - 1];
>> + if (port_dev && port_dev->child)
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&port_dev->child->dev, 0);
>> +
>> set_bit(portnum, hub->wakeup_bits);
>> kick_hub_wq(hub);
>> }
>> @@ -3434,8 +3439,11 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
>>
>> /* Skip the initial Clear-Suspend step for a remote wakeup */
>> status = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange);
>> - if (status == 0 && !port_is_suspended(hub, portstatus))
>> + if (status == 0 && !port_is_suspended(hub, portstatus)) {
>> + if (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_SUSPEND)
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&udev->dev, 0);
>> goto SuspendCleared;
>> + }
>>
>> /* see 7.1.7.7; affects power usage, but not budgeting */
>> if (hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev))
>>
>
Thanks,
Ravi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
