Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: Jun Li > Sent: 2018年3月21日 19:14 > To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; > heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx; > yueyao.zhu@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx > <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] usb: typec: tcpm: source pdo selection update > > Hi > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: 2018年3月20日 20:27 > > To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; > > heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx; > > yueyao.zhu@xxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] usb: typec: tcpm: source pdo selection update > > > > Hi, > > > > On 20-03-18 11:26, Li Jun wrote: > > > Instead of only compare between the same pdo type of sink and > > > source, this patch update the source pdo selection by checking the > > > source pdo voltage range is within that of sink. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx> > > > > This patch applies on top of the broken reverted commit, but the > > revert has already been merged by Linus: > > > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit > > .ke > > > rnel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git%2 > > > Fcommit%2Fdrivers%2Fusb%2Ftypec%3Fid%3D6f566af3462897fc743e3af6ea > > > 8cc790a13148ba&data=02%7C01%7Cjun.li%40nxp.com%7C188f2cdfa5eb44af > > > d27808d58e5dd13c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7 > > > C636571455959361056&sdata=CjnsG0rxIfJnm0K2tQyDbFxIP4Als%2BTT243Fh > > y7UYyI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > This commit is not in usb-next because it went into 4.16 as fix after 4.16-rc1. > > As already mentioned in another rhread this needs to be back-merged > > into usb-next. > > > > So this needs to be respun to apply on top of the revert so that it > > can be merged without issues with Torvald's tree later. What's the proper way to do this, should I re-post the original reverted patch and my update one based on it(so 2 patches), or just a combination (one patch)? Jun > > OK, I will do the rebase in v2. > > Thanks > Jun ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
