Hi, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> But we should return an error, right? Are devices that don't expect >> >> Right, I'm not sure :-) Do we care if we get a stall on this one? >> >>> this request going to have problems? >> >> No idea. I assume we won't. I can add the error and handle it from the >> calling site. > > FYI, here's a version with the error checks. If you prefer this version, > I can put it to Intel's testing farm for a while and see if any problems > are caught, then resend it once merge window closes. > > Let me know And FYI, here's what USB 3.2 spec says about isoch delay: "9.1.2 Bus Enumeration [...] 8. The host shall set the isochronous delay to inform the device of the delay from the time a host transmits a packet to the time it is received by the device." So it is mandatory to support this request for all USB3+ devices. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
