On Friday 20 February 2009, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 18 February 2009, greg@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I'm dropping all musb patches in my tree, here they are. > > David, can you respin what you want to keep, with your > > acks and resend them to me? If you want some in for .29, > > please let me know. > > Yes, I'll do that. Some of them are bugfixes that should go in. And as a brief status report: of that set of 12 patches, I think all of them have been resolved *except* the high bandwidth ISO one, for which Ajay just sent me an update. (I'll try to have that one to you by the end of the week.) Right now you should have about 20 MUSB (and related) patches from me in one of your inboxes. Two of those were patches from that dozen which took extra review; others include bugfixes for DMA and other stuff; and there are a few which are just cleanup. I'd like to see as many of those get into 2.6.30 as possible. Sorry I didn't get them all too you earlier ... let me know if you need help sorting them. Right now I have only four MUSB (and related) patches from other folk in my list: - that HB ISO patch ... expect this soon - peripheral STALL fixes ... Sergei's patch has issues, I may be seeing an alternative fix from someone else; - CPPI 4.2 code for DA830/OMAP-L137 ... which I'll hold off on until some public GIT tree can build those chips; - A twl4030 transceiver update ... adds a sysfs attribute, doesn't seem critical and there are a few open issues. So if there are MUSB/related patches that anyone has sent which don't seem to be in mainline, those 20 patches I've sent over the last week, or those four listed above ... it's time to re-send. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
