Hi! > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files to make it easier to > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses. > > Update the drivers/usb/ and include/linux/usb* files with the correct > SPDX license identifier based on the license text in the file itself. > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used > instead of the full boiler plate text. > > This work is based on a script and data from Thomas Gleixner, Philippe > Ombredanne, and Kate Stewart. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: Use the "standard" format of putting the identifier at the top of > the file, and use // for .c and .h files. > Removed the files already marked in Linus's tree. > > Unless someone really complains, I'm going to add this to my tree for > 4.15-rc1. as you said in some other email... this stands out a bit too much. What about using normal c comments, and put it near the original license text? It is not exactly the most important thing... Or maybe near the MODULE_LICENSE, so the two don't get out of sync? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
