Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi Doug, >>>> >>>> [add Felipe since this should go through his tree] >>> >>> Ah. Sorry Felipe! I know you've landed some dwc2 stuff in the past >> >> No problems :-) >> >>> but for some reason get_maintainer didn't ID you so I thought maybe >>> you weren't doing it anymore. Please let me know if you'd like me to >>> send this to you again with collected Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags. >> >> Yeah, please resend with all tags collected, however let's wait for a >> week or so and give other people time to catch up. I already sent my >> pull request to Greg, this would, anyway, go into the -rc cycle. > > Doh! I just re-read this one more time (after sending v3) and > realized I had read it incorrectly. I read it as "please send the that's okay :-) s**t happens > patch with the tags and I'll wait a week before landing", but you > actually said "please wait a week before re-sending". Sorry for the > noise. In the very least, you should be on the "To" line now so if > anyone else has any extra tags it should be very easy for you to see > them. > > Right that there's no massive urgency. It's been broken forever. alright then :-) >> Please add a Cc stable tag too, if necessary. > > Good point. It's a little weird since it doesn't "fix" any specific > commit, so I guess it will be up to stable folks to decide how far to > go back. The dwc2 devices I work with are actually on 3.14, but we > have some pretty massive backports related to dwc2 there... fair enough -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
