Greg,
Quoting "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
index 9b7e307..753d576 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/isp1362-hcd.c
@@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ static int isp1362_hub_control(struct usb_hcd
*hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
spin_lock_irqsave(&isp1362_hcd->lock, flags);
isp1362_write_reg32(isp1362_hcd, HCRHSTATUS, RH_HS_OCIC);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&isp1362_hcd->lock, flags);
+ /* fall through */
I'm suspicious this should be a 'break' instead.
What do you think?
case C_HUB_LOCAL_POWER:
DBG(0, "C_HUB_LOCAL_POWER\n");
break;
--
2.7.4
Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
