On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:20:29PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:51:14AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:38:07PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > > Use put_unaligned_le32 rather than using byte ordering function and > > > memcpy which makes code clear. > > > Also, add the header file where it is declared. > > > > > > Done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is : > > > > > > @ rule1 @ > > > identifier tmp; expression ptr,x; type T; > > > @@ > > > > > > - tmp = cpu_to_le32(x); > > > > > > <+... when != tmp > > > - memcpy(ptr, (T)&tmp, ...); > > > + put_unaligned_le32(x,ptr); > > > ...+> > > > > > > @ depends on rule1 @ > > > type j; identifier tmp; > > > @@ > > > > > > - j tmp; > > > ...when != tmp > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v2: > > > * added correct header file. > > > > > > drivers/usb/wusbcore/security.c | 9 ++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/wusbcore/security.c b/drivers/usb/wusbcore/security.c > > > index 170f2c3..256b56f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/wusbcore/security.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/wusbcore/security.c > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > > * > > > * FIXME: docs > > > */ > > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > > > Ick, really? asm/ ? As the first include? That feels wrong, at the > > very least, it needs to be at the end of the include list please. > > I just sent a v3 patch with the necessary change! > Also, would you mind explaining as to why asm/ should not be the first > include ? Do you see any other files that have it that way? It's traditionally last. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
