On 20/09/2017 at 10:30:31 +0200, Romain Izard wrote: > 2017-09-19 17:25 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > >> On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote: > >> > The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left > >> > alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode, > >> > restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> On sama5d2 Xplained board (i2c0 from flexcom 4). > >> and obviously: > >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks Romain! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > This is the first time I've seen this patch. Why's that? > > > > As the patchset covers many subsystems, get_maintainers.pl provided a > very long list of both developpers and mailing lists (28). I thought it > was a good idea to shorten it a little. Bad idea. Sorry. > I think the correct way of handling that would have been to send each patch to the proper subsystem as there are no dependency here. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
