On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is already a working UVC kernel driver that talks to the correct > userspace api (which is V4L), in the kernel tree. > > So I strongly recommend looking at the code we have today if you have > questions about it. What exactly is not working for you with what we > have? > > thanks, > > greg k-h I was not clear about new cameras/camera sensors. If I have a camera/camera sensor that is not listed in http://www.ideasonboard.org/uvc/, do I need to write a new v4l2 driver which in turn will communicate with UVC? Do I modify UVC itself to add a new camera/camera sensor? Or does the camera/camera sensor need to comply with some sort of standard in order to be UVC compatible (i.e. I don't have to write any drivers). -- Rail Shafigulin Software Engineer Esencia Technologies -- *ESENCIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.*3945 Freedom Circle, Suite #360, Santa Clara CA 95054 ________________________________________________________ Phone: +1 408 736 8284 Fax: +1 408 519 3475 http://www.esenciatech.com | http://www.lnttechservices.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
