On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:49:08 +0200
Johan Hovold johan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:58:30PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:52:10 +0200
>> Johan Hovold johan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>> >> Add USB part with common functions for USB-GPIO/I2C/SPI master
>> >> adapters. These allow communication with chip's control, transmit
>> >> and receive endpoints and will be used by various FT232H drivers.
>> >
>> >> +static const struct mfd_cell ftdi_cells[] = {
>> >> + { .name = "ftdi-cbus-gpio", },
>> >> + { .name = "ftdi-mpsse-i2c", },
>> >> + { .name = "ftdi-mpsse-spi", },
>> >> + { .name = "ftdi-fifo-fpp-mgr", },
>> >> +};
>> >
>> >Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't these modes really mutually
>> >exclusive, possibly with exception of cbus-gpio (some pins are at least
>> >available as GPIOs in MPSSE mode)? Then MFD is not is not the right fit
>> >here either.
>>
>> MPSSE and FIFO modes are mutually exclusive, but I'm not sure about
>> MPSSE and CBUS-GPIO. CBUS-GPIO didn't work as expected when I was
>> testing with MPSSE SPI master driver, but maybe it is a driver issue.
>
>Yes, that wasn't clear to me either from just looking at the data
>sheets. MPSSE seems to deal with its GPIOs differently.
yes, the GPIOs are at different pins in MPSSE mode and these pins are
controlled via writes/reads to/from bulk endpoint with MPSSE commands.
>> FT245 FIFO and CBUS GPIO can be switched by a control request, when
>> FIFO mode is configured in the EEPROM.
>
>Since the set_bitmode command is used to control the CBUS gpios, does
>that mean that they cannot be toggled independently while FIFO mode is
>in use (as the same command is used to set FIFO mode)?
yes.
Thanks,
Anatolij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
