RE: [PATCH v5] xhci: Bad Ethernet performance plugged in ASM1042A host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Thanks, looks good, but checkpatch complains about:
>>
>>> +               usleep_range(50, 50);
>>
>>
>> having same min and max value.
>> Does usleep_range(40,60) work for you? or some other range?
>>
>It works to use usleep_range(40,60);
>Thanks for help us to upstream the patch.
>
>> I can change that myself, no need to resend.
>>

Mathias,

I didn’t see this applied at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mnyman/xhci.git/log/?h=for-usb-next
So I just wanted to confirm if you saw Jiahau's response.  

Also, would you consider this for -stable? 
Jiahau didn't previously cc @stable in the submission so I wanted to see if you could add that before applying or if you would like him to do that separately he can re-send to @stable.

Thanks,
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux