Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: host: xhci: using dma pool for scratchpad buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:06:53AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> > According to xHCI ch4.20 Scratchpad Buffers
> >> > 	A Scratchpad Buffer is a PAGESIZE block of system memory
> >> >        	located on a PAGESIZE boundary
> >> > 	...
> >> > 	Software clears the Scratchpad Buffer to ‘0’
> >> >
> >> > So, we need to use dma pool for PAGESIZE boundary buffer, and zeroed
> >> > its region using dma_pool_zalloc.
> >> 
> >> you're doing two separate things here...
> >> 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> >> >  drivers/usb/host/xhci.h     |  1 +
> >> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> > index 22a03b7..56aa0a6 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> > @@ -1710,12 +1710,18 @@ static int scratchpad_alloc(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
> >> >  		goto fail_sp3;
> >> >  
> >> >  	xhci->dcbaa->dev_context_ptrs[0] = cpu_to_le64(xhci->scratchpad->sp_dma);
> >> > +
> >> > +	xhci->scratchpad_pool = dma_pool_create("xhci scratchpad buffer pool",
> >> > +			dev, xhci->page_size,
> >> > +			xhci->page_size, xhci->page_size);
> >> 
> >> adding a DMA pool here, and ...
> >> 
> >> > +	if (!xhci->scratchpad_pool)
> >> > +		goto fail_sp4;
> >> > +
> >> >  	for (i = 0; i < num_sp; i++) {
> >> >  		dma_addr_t dma;
> >> > -		void *buf = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, xhci->page_size, &dma,
> >> > -				flags);
> >> > +		void *buf = dma_pool_zalloc(xhci->scratchpad_pool, flags, &dma);
> >> 
> >> ... fixing a possible bug here.
> >> 
> >
> > I know it is two things, but after the dma pool is introduced, we need a
> > new API to allocate memory, do you want to me use dma_pool_alloc first,
> > then, change it to use dma_pool_zalloc at another patch? I am ok to do
> > that.
> 
> the other way around. First you patch dma_alloc_coherent() to
> dma_zalloc_coherent() and that could go in during the -rc and possibly
> get a stable tag, since spec requires kernel to zero the memory area.
> 
> -- 
> balbi

In fact, it fixes two things at spec, the other thing is the scratchpad
buffer needs to be page_size boundary. I will send these two fixes
first.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux