Hi, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Roger, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Friday 03 Mar 2017 13:17:15 Roger Quadros wrote: >> On alternate setting change, webcam gadget sends us a UVC_EVENT_STREAMON >> or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. It expects delayed status response on >> STREAMON event only but doesn't expect us to send that response over USB. >> It sends the delayed response when we issue the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. >> >> So we must not send UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE ioctl in these cases that too >> with invalid response length. > > The commit message only explains why we should not call UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE > in response to a STREAMON event, but not why we shouldn't either in response > to a STREAMOFF event. The patch is correct changing both, but I propose > wording the above two paragraphs as follows. > > "uvc-gadget: Do not send Set Interface (alternate setting) response twice > > On alternate setting change, the webcam gadget sends us a UVC_EVENT_STREAMON > or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. In the first case, the driver will issue a > delayed status response automatically when we call the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. > In the second case, the driver sends the status response immediately. We must > thus not send the status response manually with UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in any of > those cases." > > If you're fine with that I'll change the message when applying, there's no > need to resend the patch. I have this in my testing/fixes and was planning to send it to Greg this week. I can drop it from my queue, no problem, but then let me know as you would need my acked-by. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature