On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 21:03 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 08:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 19:45 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> > > On 02/08/2017 05:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 16:17 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> > > > > On 02/08/2017 02:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > >
> Should I keep my inline {clr,set}_bit_in_byte()
> functions an use BIT() in there, or delete them and use BIT()
> directly
> in usb251xb_get_ofdata() ?
Does it make any sense?
Even just name of your function is longer than what it substitutes.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
