Hi! > > > Can I get the copy of the patch? > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg152542.html > > > > > > ...but it is html mangled with no obvious way to unmangle it. > > Bounced it to you. FYI, patchwork.kernel.org should have it too, the > "mbox" option there works the best. Thanks, applied. Problem did not reappear so far. > > > > I was able to hit that only once so far, do you hit it > > > > every time with your built-in g_ether .config? > > > > > > I get it "way too often", like once a day. I don't yet know how to hit > > > it reliably :-(. > > OK, well let's hope the patch linked above fixes it. At some point the > number of musb fixes should just start going down if I'm predicting right :) Fingers crossed :-). > Anyways, hitting these issues during late -rc cycle is too late. We > really should have some n900 usability testing for core features with > Linux next on at least weekly basis. Ok, I can try. But so far even -rc1 is a lot of fun. But... I consider phone calls core feature of a phone. I'd very much like to get that to work. Unfortunately, that means real-time audio, and a lot of fun. Plus, as it is touchscreen device, it needs a GUI. > I've noticed that testing with Linux next is way less effort than chasing > bugs every -rc cycle when it's too late. For about past four months or so > next has been usable for me with only occasional minor issues that get > fixed within a day or two. Well, I am carrying some patches... but maybe mainline is now good enough to be useable without them? No promises. I really should find more time for N900 development. Hmm. Or more developers. Where are all those Eudyptula Challenge people when you need them? Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
