Hi, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > Since commit c499ff71ff2a2 ("usb: dwc3: core: re-factor init and exit paths") > (merged in 4.8), the usb ports on odroid-XU4 don't work anymore. > > [ Actually, it's commit 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores"), cf below ] > > Inserting an usb key (USB2.0) on the USB3.0 port result in: > [ 64.488264] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: Port resume took longer than 20000 msec, port status = 0xc400fe3 > [ 74.568156] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: xHCI host not responding to stop endpoint command. > [ 74.574806] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: Assuming host is dying, halting host. > [ 74.601970] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.2.auto: HC died; cleaning up > [ 74.606276] usb 3-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 > [ 74.613565] usb 4-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 > [ 74.621208] usb usb3-port1: couldn't allocate usb_device > NB: it's not related to USB2.0 devices, I get the same result with an USB3.0 device (SATA to USB3 for instance). > NB2: it doesn't happen on an odriod-XU3 board, that doesn't have the realtek RTL8153 chip. > > I instrumented what was read/written in the registers before and after this patch, and I found that the culprit is: > if (dwc->revision > DWC3_REVISION_194A) > reg |= DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_SUSPHY; > Before commit c499ff71ff2a2 ("usb: dwc3: core: re-factor init and exit paths"), dwc3_phy_setup() was > done early in dwc3_probe() and thus, dwc->revision wasn't set yet (==0) > After this commit, dwc3_phy_setup() is done in dwc3_core_init(), after setting dwc->revision (it's done in dwc3_core_is_valid()). > > (The dwc3->revision on odroid-XU4 is 5533200a.) > > If I comment out the 2 lines: > if (dwc->revision > DWC3_REVISION_194A) > reg |= DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_SUSPHY; > The usb key is recognized right away: > [ 38.008158] usb 3-1.2: new high-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd > [ 38.138924] usb 3-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=abcd, idProduct=1234 > [ 38.144399] usb 3-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 > > I took a look at the history behind those 2 lines, and they've been introduced by: > commit 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores") in 3.19. > In 3.19, the dwc->revision dwc3_phy_setup() was set in dwc3_core_init(). > And, booting a 3.19 kernel on XU4 gives the same error (whereas booting a 3.18 kernel is ok) > > [ So, I should have started this email with: > Since commit 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores"), > the usb ports on odroid-XU4 don't work anymore. ] > > The funny thing is that commit 45bb7de213d8("usb: dwc3: setup phys earlier") (merged in 4.2) > moved dwc3_phy_setup() in dwc3_probe(), way before dwc->revision was set, acting like a revert > on commit 2164a476205c("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores") > That's why on 4.2, inserting an USB key on odroid-XU4 worked again, > > So, to make a resume: > xxx-> 3.18: usb ok > 3.19->4.1: usb error (due to commit 2164a476205ccc ("usb: dwc3: set SUSPHY bit for all cores")) > 4.2->4.7: usb ok (due to commit 45bb7de213d8("usb: dwc3: setup phys earlier")) > 4.8->now: usb error (due to commit c499ff71ff2a2 ("usb: dwc3: core: re-factor init and exit paths")) > > > any idea on this ? Thanks for bisecting. This could be caused by a similar case as described at [1]. Can you check if adding quirk "snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk" helps ? [1] https://marc.info/?i=2B3535C5ECE8B5419E3ECBE300772909021B3FD37E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html