Re: [PATCH 00/16] musb fixes for v4.10-rc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:50:52AM -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:27:53PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:01:43AM -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:38:47PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:15:05AM -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > 
> > > > > These are musb fixes for v4.10-rc3, which fix the bugs in musb core and
> > > > > some glue layers for some use cases, such as bogus interrupts while musb
> > > > > in heavy load, WARINING while rmmod omap2430 glue, and a few fixes in PM,
> > > > > and cleanup as while.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know if any change is needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, all of them need to be changed, come on, this was horrible, would
> > > > you take this type of patch series for 4.10-rc3?  Why make me reject
> > > > them?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I know some patches in this set generally don't belong to -rc3+,
> > > I should have sent them for v4.10-rc2 (this set was already ready even
> > > before v4.10-rc1 came out), but due the holidays, I was offline last
> > > week, and thought at this time v4.10-rc3 might be still considered as
> > > -rc2 due to the slowness of the holidays. So I sent the set now.
> > 
> > Why would they be ok for -rc2?  There should not be any difference for
> > -rc2 vs. any later rc.
> 
> I read somewhere last year when I started maintaining musb that -rc2 can
> be an extension of -rc1.

Nope, it's never been that way, that wouldn't make much sense if you
think it through :)

> But anyway I will ensure to only send regression fixes to -rc2+ from
> now on.

thank you.

> But please clarify if some fixes such as 01/16 in this set can go into
> -rc2+ or not? It is not a regression of -rc1 but a major fix. In other
> words, if -rc2+ _only_ takes regression fixes for current -rc1?

Ideally, only fixes for -rc1, but early in the -rc series we can take
bugfixes that are "obvious" for things that people are reporting.  Look
at the xhci patch series I just took as an example of that.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux