HI,
On 23-12-16 02:25, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi,
On 12/22/2016 09:18 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<snip>
Matthias, assuming Felipe is ok with putting this in drivers/misc
(minus the phy bindings), are you ok with the xhci blurb which
registers the platform-device for the "misc" driver to bind to?
This is the one thing Greg was against. The creation of the "fake"
platform-device from XHCI.
Greg was unhappy with my portmux patch set due to "faking
a platform-device from a PCI device". We need to avoid this.
I strongly believe that the platfrom device approach is the right
thing to do, and note it is not a fake device it is a child
device, which pretty much accurately reflects how the hardware
is put together, see e.g. the /proc/iomem output with this
patch:
91a00000-91a0ffff : 0000:00:14.0
91a00000-91a0ffff : xhci-hcd
91a08070-91a0846f : intel_cht_usb_phy
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
