On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Mateusz Berezecki wrote: > > Il giorno 15 dic 2016, alle ore 06:51, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > > > Hmmm, this is the third patch labelled v2 that you have mailed. In the > > future, be more careful about your version numbering. > > Ok. Maybe I misunderstood versioning of patches. I thought of > versions numbering the concept/approach rather than the actual > revision of the patch. Should they all have been sent with an > incremented number ? Yes, they should. The number refers to the actual revision of the patch. The only situation where the number might not change is if you submitted the exact same patch more than once -- for example, if the patch was part of a series you were resubmitting because some of the other patches in the series had been updated. (Some people would increment the version number even then.) > > This all looks good. > > > > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cool. Thanks for help and feedback! You're welcome. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
