On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 13:50 +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > 1) Should we use "source" and "sink" instead of "device" and "host" > with the prefer_role attribute after all? I was uncomfortable with > that when we talked about it last time because the terms kept changing > with every new Type-C specification version. But I guess "source" and > "sink" would make sense in the end. This has been requested by several > guys now. > > 2) Can we change the way we list the supported roles? They are now > comma separated, but can we use new line instead: > > % cat supported_data_roles > host > device > % > > 3) Instead of the "supports_usb_power_delivery" attribute file which > we have for the ports and partners, it seem it would be more > interesting to know the supported USB Power Delivery Specification > version for some, and also USB Type-C Specification version in > separate attribute file. So basically we would have > "usb_power_delivery_version" and "usb_typec_version" attributes > instead or "supports_usb_power_delivery". > > > So would these changes be OK still at this point to everybody? Hi, they are all right with me. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
