Re: [PATCH 9/9] musb_gadget_ep0: fix unhandled IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, I wrote:

The EP0 code routinely ignores interrupt at end of the data phase because of musb_g_ep0_giveback() resetting the state machine to "idle, waiting for SETUP"
phase prematurely.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
This fixes most of the unhandled gadget interrupts that generic_interrupt() and davinci_interrupt() have been hiding from user by faking their result and only
emitting 5th level debug message (for what is clearly an error).

And of course it turrned out to be only yhe tip of an iceberg. It uncovered another race happening when the last IN packet is sent and CSR.DataEnd bit is set along with it: there supposed to be *two* interrupts after that -- they seem to often be coalsesced into a single one (when using Linux host)

Perhaps it's the status completion and the SETUP packet reception interrupts that get coalesced...

but when testing with Windows RNDIS driver they come separate and cause another unhandled IRQ to happen, right after the one that got fixed by this patch. Also, the driver falls thru to the "idle, wating for SETUP" phase after receiving SetupEnd interrupt -- that's incorrect,

No, that's correct. What's actually incorrect is that the driver doesn't complete the request in that case... will address by the different patch.

what follows is the early status phase, with another interrupt (that won't be handled as well due to wrong phase).

Though I suspect that in reality these two distinct interrupts will often coalesce as well as DATA1 token should follow IN/OUT pretty quick. What a racy piece of hardware... :-/

I think I'll experiment with this (not setting the DataEnd bit should cause SetupEnd interrupts).

So, I'm goind to recast this patch, adding more fixes -- if there's

s/goind/going/

no objections...

Perhaps the simplest thing to do would be to return IRQ_HANDLED from the "idle, waiting for SETUP" phase regardess of RxPktRdy...

It's not just simplest, it now seems the only correct thing to do. However, falling thru from the status in/out state right into the idle state seems of dubios value. I always see (at least) two distinct interrupts.

WBR, Sergei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux