On 24.11.2016 11:02, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
the tt_info provided by a HS hub might be in use to by a child device
Make sure we free the devices in the correct order.
This is needed in special cases such as when xhci controller is
reset when resuming from hibernate, and all virt_devices are freed.
Also free the virt_devices starting from max slot_id as children
more commonly have higher slot_id than parent.
CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Guenter Roeck, does this work for you?
A rework of how tt_info is stored and used might be needed,
but that will take some time and won't go to stable as easily.
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index 6afe323..b3a5cd8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -979,6 +979,40 @@ void xhci_free_virt_device(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id)
xhci->devs[slot_id] = NULL;
}
+/*
+ * Free a virt_device structure.
+ * If the virt_device added a tt_info (a hub) and has children pointing to
+ * that tt_info, then free the child first. Recursive.
+ * We can't rely on udev at this point to find child-parent relationships.
+ */
+void xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id)
+{
+ struct xhci_virt_device *vdev;
+ struct list_head *tt_list_head;
+ struct xhci_tt_bw_info *tt_info, *next;
+ int i;
+
+ vdev = xhci->devs[slot_id];
+ if (!vdev)
+ return;
+
+ tt_list_head = &(xhci->rh_bw[vdev->real_port - 1].tts);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(tt_info, next, tt_list_head, tt_list) {
+ /* is this a hub device that added a tt_info to the tts list */
+ if (tt_info->slot_id == slot_id) {
if (tt_info->slot_id != slot_id)
continue;
+ /* are any devices using this tt_info? */
+ for (i = 1; i < HCS_MAX_SLOTS(xhci->hcs_params1); i++) {
off-by-one here ? Why is i starting from 1?
+ vdev = xhci->devs[i];
slit_id 0 is reserved and xhci->devs[0] is not used, so ne need to check it.
All other places that check xhci->devs[0] are avtually buggy
-Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
