On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:59:44PM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote: > Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is legacy. > Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) What changed from v1? > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > index cbb1467..4081672 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > @@ -1802,23 +1802,21 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) > > /* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */ > /* specs is not defined, but it works */ > - if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0) && > - (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)) { > -descriptor_error: > + > + /* Reject in following cases: > + * - Interface subclass is not 0 or 1 > + * - Multiple endpoints > + * - Not an interrupt in endpoint > + */ > + endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc; > + if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0 && > + desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1) || > + desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1 || > + !usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint)) { > dev_err(&intf->dev, "bad descriptor, ignoring hub\n"); > return -EIO; > } > > - /* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */ > - if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1) > - goto descriptor_error; > - > - endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc; > - > - /* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */ > - if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint)) > - goto descriptor_error; > - As "horrible" as the original code might be, it's much easier to read and follow, which is the key thing here, right? What's so bad about a goto backwards? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html