Matthew Dharm wrote: > > I think what he's saying (at least, what I read it to mean) was this: > Existing HCDs would use the existing mechanism for s-g lists. The new HCD > to support USB 3.0, which (apparently) has more capability, would process > the buffer list directly. The usb_sg_* code would need to be changed to > recognize a more capable HCD and pass the s-g list to that HCD for "direct" > processing. Yes. (Although, my interest is in future wireless USB host controllers and not USB 3.0.) David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
