On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:09:40PM +0000, Binyamin Sharet (bsharet) wrote: > Hi, > > After confusing Greg, here’s the current status of all 11 issues initially reported by us. > > Since the initial tests were done on a rather old kernel (4.4) we retested on 4.7 and 4.8-rc2, > so, not reproduced means - not reproduced on 4.7 and 4.8-rc2. > > The issues appear with the same numbering as in the detailed emails. > > [01/11][0aa8:8001] not reproduced > [02/11][10cf:5500] reproduced, no patch provided > [03/11][0471:0602] not reproduced > [04/11][0557:2002] reproduced (happens when FW is missing) > fixed in a patch I received from Oliver Neukum > [05/11][22b8:2d93] not reproduced > fixed for v4.4 (which has this issue) in patches I received from Oliver > [06/11][3923:718a] reproduced, no patch provided > [07/11][160a:3184] reproduced, no patch provided > [08/11][076d:0006] not reproduced > [09/11][05c5:0002] not reproduced > [10/11][1a0a:0102] not a bug. expected behaviour. > [11/11][9022:d483] reproduced. > after testing a patch from Felipe, we moved to a new issue, no patch for it yet. > I have no idea how to track these xxxx:xxxx values back to a driver easily, can you give me a hint? Think about someone receiving this type of message, it's a bit hard to know what needs to be done here, right? still confused. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
