Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guenter,

> > Overall this is quite vague and, especially for chargers, most of the time
> > misses the point.
> > 
> > I would really prefer if we could stay closer to the specification in this
> > case, and not try to merge multiple orthogonal attributes into one.
> 
> OK. So what would you propose?

I'm actually only conserned about the accessory case, as there we are
really not a source/sink/DRP, nor are we DPF/UFP/DRD. Should we use
this attribute to only express if the type of the partner is "normal"
or an accessory?


Thanks,

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux