Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] usb: gadget: f_hid: use alloc_ep_req()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 22/08/16 08:45, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> John Youn <John.Youn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 8/8/2016 1:30 PM, Felipe F. Tonello wrote:
>>> Use gadget's framework allocation function instead of directly calling
>>> usb_ep_alloc_request().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Felipe F. Tonello <eu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c | 6 +-----
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>> index a010496e4e05..89d2e9a5a04f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>> @@ -611,14 +611,10 @@ static int hidg_bind(struct usb_configuration *c, struct usb_function *f)
>>>  
>>>  	/* preallocate request and buffer */
>>>  	status = -ENOMEM;
>>> -	hidg->req = usb_ep_alloc_request(hidg->in_ep, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	hidg->req = alloc_ep_req(hidg->in_ep, hidg->report_length);
>>>  	if (!hidg->req)
>>>  		goto fail;
>>>  
>>> -	hidg->req->buf = kmalloc(hidg->report_length, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -	if (!hidg->req->buf)
>>> -		goto fail;
>>> -
>>>  	/* set descriptor dynamic values */
>>>  	hidg_interface_desc.bInterfaceSubClass = hidg->bInterfaceSubClass;
>>>  	hidg_interface_desc.bInterfaceProtocol = hidg->bInterfaceProtocol;
>>>
>>
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> This commit on your testing/next breaks compilation.
>>
>> ../drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c: In function ‘hidg_bind’:
>> ../drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c:620:14: error: too few arguments to function ‘alloc_ep_req’
>>   hidg->req = alloc_ep_req(hidg->in_ep, hidg->report_length);
>>               ^
>> In file included from ../drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c:24:0:
>> ../drivers/usb/gadget/u_f.h:63:21: note: declared here
>>  struct usb_request *alloc_ep_req(struct usb_ep *ep, size_t len, int default_len);
> 
> true that :-) Dropping from my queue.
> 

Are you applying the previous patches? Specially that this is the last
patch in the series, how can it break with you if it doesn't break here?
What should I do then?

Thanks

-- 
Felipe

Attachment: 0x92698E6A.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux