Hi, ayaka <ayaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>> On 08/13/2016 01:44 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:38:46AM +0800, ayaka wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 08/12/2016 03:40 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:23:15AM +0800, ayaka wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello all: >>>>>>>>> I recently add a support for customize am3358 board using the branch >>>>>>>>> processor-sdk-linux-03.00.00 from Ti git. But I meet a problem with musb >>>>>>>>> at the peripheral mode. >>>>>>>> Then you are going to have to get support from TI for this, nothing we >>>>>>>> can do here about random vendor kernel trees, sorry. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you can use the 4.7 tree, or better yet, the 4.8-rc tree, then we >>>>>>> I have tried the 4.8-rc1, I meet the same problem. >>>>>> What problem is that exactly? >>>>> Sorry, the USB1 can't work at high speed gadget mode and have DMA problem. >>>>> musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: Failed to request rx1. >>>>> musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_init_controller failed with status -517 >>>> -517 is EPROBE_DEFER. Most likely DMA hasn't probed and MUSB is >>>> deferring to try later. This does _NOT_ MUSB can't work with >>>> DMA. Perhaps you didn't enable support for MUSB's DMA engine. >>>> >>> I have set the status of cppi41dma to okay in dts. And CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI41_DMA, >>> CONFIG_TI_CPPI41 and CONFIG_TI_EDMA are enabled with build into kernel. >>> >>> Anything else I should do? >> no, that should do it. Since musb returned -EPROBE_DEFER, it will retry >> probing later. Check if musb probed fine. The easiest way is to check if >> you have anything in /sys/class/udc/ > Yes, it has musb-hdrc.0.auto. But it doesn't mean that it fallback PIO mode? no, it doesn't. MUSB knows it needs the DMA, that's why is defers its own probe routine. > Actually I don't care whether it use PIO or DMA, I just can't bear it > work in USB 2.0 Full Speed mode, too slow. So it always enumerates in Full-speed? That's odd. Bin, any ideas? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature