On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:06:25AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:59:59AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > But your patch was "one-way", once you switched to the other mode, the > > old one could not be used :( > > Yes, also was lacking proper description and signoff. So, I'm considering > ioctls based approach okay, although that question (the only one I really > had) was never answered. > > After re-reading specifications [*] I decided to allow arbitrary MsgID > selection, as USB488 adds MsgID=TRIGGER (128) and other subclass > specifications may add other values. > > [*] http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/devclass_docs/USBTMC_1_006a.zip > > After sorting out all eventual objections, patch bellow will be turned > into proper one. Looks reasonable to me. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
