Hi, Balbi & Robert
Have one question about commit 7acc9973e3c4 ("usb: phy: generic: add
vbus support").
Sorry asking here.
Commit 7acc9973e3c4 ("usb: phy: generic: add vbus support") is adding
GPIO-based VBUS handling for phy-generic.c
And now we are uploading usb phy to drivers/phy/, as Balbi mentioned
drivers/usb/phy/ will not accept new phy driver.
Any suggestion about handling vbus (gpio) for the phy under drivers/phy/
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Felipe Balbi
<felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> your commit 7acc9973e3c4 ("usb: phy: generic: add vbus support") added
> GPIO-based VBUS handling for phy-generic.c, but that ends up calling
> usb_gadget_vbus_connect() which forces NOP to depend on the gadget API.
>
> I was grepping around and couldn't find any users for that VBUS gpio
> _and_ we have phy-gpio-vbus.c which does the same thing.
>
> I'm wondering if we should drop the usb_gadget_vbus_connect() support so
> other phy-generic users (like ehci-omap) can rely on it without
> depending on the gadget API.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
