On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 13:49 +0200, Kristian Evensen wrote:
>> @@ -428,10 +434,47 @@ int usbnet_cdc_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct
>> usb_interface *intf)
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> + if (dev->net->dev_addr[0] & 0x02)
>> + eth_hw_addr_random(dev->net);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usbnet_cdc_bind);
>>
>> +static int usbnet_cdc_zte_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct
>> usb_interface *intf)
>> +{
>> + int status = usbnet_cdc_bind(dev, intf);
>> +
>> + if (status)
>> + return status;
>> +
>> + if (dev->net->dev_addr[0] & 0x02)
>> + eth_hw_addr_random(dev->net);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> That really makes no sense.
Ops, my bad. Thanks for catching it. The check for random hw_addr
should only be in the zte_bind() function.
-Kristian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
