Hi, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> writes: >>> - amend the drivers (for my part I have pxa27x_udc.c and probably pxa25x_udc.c) >>> to subscribe to the notifier, and in the action function call either >>> usb_gadget_vbus_connect() or usb_gadget_vbus_disconnect(). >>> >>> Would that kind of approach solve the layering issue, what do you think ? >> >> I like second option of having PHY simply sending the notification and >> relying on UDC to actually call usb_gadget_vbus_*(). >> >> I could write the patches, but I wouldn't have any means to test them >> :-s >> >> Let me know if you prefer to write them yourself or want me to give it a >> shot. > Hi Felipe, > > I'll write the 3 patches and test them, as it's easier when you have the proper > hardware : > - one for pxa27x_udc.c > - one for pxa25x_udc.c > - one for phy-generic.c > > I don't know if there are other users than pxa, I'll make the assumption there > aren't. yeah, we can keep patches in linux-next for as long as possible. If nobody complains, we're good. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
