> -----Original Message----- > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 5:52 PM > To: Gadiyar, Anand > Cc: Sergei Shtylyov; felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx; > linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxx; > davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] MUSB driver fixes > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:06:03PM +0530, Anand Gadiyar wrote: > > Can we drop your tree and just let Greg queue it up in his series if either > > you or Dave ACK the patch? > > > > I don't see any use of having a separate MUSB tree. > > I created the tree cuz people was finding it difficult to generate > patches on top of mainline then some patches weren't applying cuz people > didn't have Greg's queue. > > So, we'll have to find an agreement here. Let's here from everybody. > Dave, sergei, Ajay, Greg, Kevin, etc etc > It would be the same for __all__ USB patches, right? And I don't see anyone complaining about difficulty generating those patches. All, please arrive at a consensus before the next merge window. Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
